Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-05-08 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is much better than the iPhone SE's general score of 75.7. Although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much newer than iPhone SE, it is a lot heavier and incredibly thicker. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a quite superior performance than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a slightly better display than Apple iPhone SE, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a greater pixels count per screen inch and a lot bigger display. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much greater memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone SE, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much better battery life than iPhone SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 1624mAh. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way better camera than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low light images and videos, higher 60 fps video frame rates, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.