Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-11-27 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 is slightly better than iPhone SE, having a 78.2 score against 75.7. Even though the Xiaomi Poco M3 is way newer than iPhone SE, it's notably heavier and notably thicker. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a bit more powerful processor than iPhone SE, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 and iPhone SE feature similar displays, although the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite higher display density and a way bigger display. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a greater memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone SE, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much longer battery duration than iPhone SE, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much better camera than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a much bigger sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.