Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-02-07 |
| 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Gold, Rose gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1136 x 640 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1624mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro is a little bit better than Apple iPhone SE, getting a 76.6 score against 75.7. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro body is noticeably newer, but just a little thicker and a lot heavier than Apple iPhone SE. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a little bit better display than iPhone SE, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little higher screen density and a way larger display.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone SE, and although they both have equal internal memory, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a quite better performance than iPhone SE, because it has 6 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a very superior battery life than iPhone SE, because it has a 146 percent bigger battery size. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than iPhone SE, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a way bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments, a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.