Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2017-11-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.17 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is just a bit better than Google Pixel, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 80.2. IPhone X's construction is newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than the Google Pixel. The Apple iPhone X has a more powerful CPU than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone X features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a just a little better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, a larger screen and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Apple iPhone X counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel features a battery lifetime that's just as good as the battery lifetime in iPhone X, although the Google Pixel also has 2770mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh. The Apple iPhone X captures a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor providing a way worse image quality, a lower video resolution and a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.