Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than the Google Pixel 3's score of 80. IPhone X is an older and somewhat heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3, but Apple managed to make it just a bit thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone X features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X has just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit higher screen density. The Apple iPhone X has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Apple iPhone X counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 3 features a bit superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 2915mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.