Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, having a score of 88.1 against 80.7. Although Apple iPhone X is older than Google Pixel 3 XL, it's construction is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Apple iPhone X features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a way worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. IPhone X has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone X counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality pictures and videos, a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a lesser mega pixels resolution camera, they both have the same aperture. The Google Pixel 3 XL has longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 26% more battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.