Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than Google Pixel 3a, having an 88.1 score against 78.8. IPhone X's body is just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 3a, but it is heavier and was released about 18 months before. The Apple iPhone X counts with a more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone X has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Apple iPhone X has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors, a camera in the back with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, they both have a same size camera aperture.
The iPhone X counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3a has a bit superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.