Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 overall score. Although Apple iPhone X is older and just a little bit heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL, it's body is still just a bit thinner. The iPhone X counts with a better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone X has a better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px. The Apple iPhone X features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos and a less mega pixels resolution back camera, they both have a same size camera aperture.
IPhone X counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3a XL features a much better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.