Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a, with a global score of 88.1 against 82.9. Apple iPhone X's body is a little thinner than Google Pixel 4a, but it is somewhat heavier and was released 3 years before. IPhone X has a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone X has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Apple iPhone X also has a bit more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436. IPhone X captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels, a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photos.
IPhone X counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4a counts with a little better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.