Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G's global score of 87.5. The Apple iPhone X construction is just a little bit thinner than Google Pixel 4a 5G, but it is just a little heavier and was released 3 years before. IPhone X counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone X counts with just a bit better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a bit more pixels per display inch. Google Pixel 4a 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture, a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with more mega pixels.
Apple iPhone X counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a 5G. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 4a 5G, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.