Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is a little bit better than iPhone X's overall score of 88.1. Google Pixel 5's body is newer and lighter, but a little bit thicker than the iPhone X. IPhone X has a little better performance than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Google Pixel 5 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, a more MP camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments.
IPhone X has a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Google Pixel 5 features a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 50% bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 5 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.