Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2022-07-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than the Google Pixel 6a, having a score of 88.1 against 76.4. The iPhone X is an incredibly older cellphone than Google Pixel 6a, but Apple made it thinner and just a little bit lighter. The iPhone X has a much better performance than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone X features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a little bit higher screen pixels density. Apple iPhone X features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, a camera with less MP and a worse 3840x2160 video definition.
The iPhone X counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 6a, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 6a has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4410mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 6a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 6a. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 6a, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.