Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting a general score of 88.1 against 82.2. The Apple iPhone X counts with a much better looking display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a way higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s memory capacity to install games and applications is very similar to iPhone X's one, they have equal internal memory. Apple iPhone X counts with a very superior processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less CPU cores and 13 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s camera is just as good as iPhone X's camera, and although the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution, they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.