Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 463 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.72 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than HTC One M9, having a general score of 88.1 against 77.7. The iPhone X design is much newer and extremely thinner than the HTC One M9's, but it's a little bit heavier. The Apple iPhone X has a little better performance than HTC One M9, although it has a lower number of cores and doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, they both have 3 GB of RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit.
The HTC One M9 has a little more vivid display than iPhone X, although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit worse display density and a little smaller screen. Apple iPhone X features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The HTC One M9 has a little better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5% greater battery capacity. The HTC One M9 has a camera that's just as good as iPhone X's camera, because although the HTC One M9 has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone X, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC One M9, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.