Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| 2017-11-03 | 2017-05-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 463 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the HTC U11's score of 77.6. Although the iPhone X and the HTC U11 were only released 6 months apart, iPhone X's body is just a bit heavier but a bit thinner. The iPhone X counts with a bit better looking screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit inferior pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The iPhone X features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Apple iPhone X has just a little better performance than HTC U11, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone X shoots a bit better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same resolution camera, the iPhone X also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates.
HTC U11 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC U11. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save some money and buy the HTC U11, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.