Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Titan gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than LG K92's overall score of 85.4. IPhone X is an a lot older phone than LG K92, but it is a little thinner and lighter anyway. Apple iPhone X counts with a more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a just a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display.
LG K92 counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. IPhone X features a better performing CPU than LG K92, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although faster) and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
LG K92 has a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 47 percent greater battery size. LG K92 takes better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the LG K92 also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality and a way higher resolution back camera.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K92. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG K92, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.