Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Mirror black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than LG Q70's general score of 77.9. Apple iPhone X's design is lighter and just a bit thinner than LG Q70, even though it was released many years before. The iPhone X has a better performing processor than LG Q70, because although it has lesser RAM and 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone X counts with a more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a bit greater display pixels density. The LG Q70 counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Q70 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2716mAh. LG Q70 shoots a bit better photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photos.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Q70. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get LG Q70, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.