Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Holographic white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the LG Stylo 6's global score of 76.7. Apple iPhone X's construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than the LG Stylo 6, even though it was released many years before. Apple iPhone X features a bit more vivid screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
The LG Stylo 6 features more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone X counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone X shoots much better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and a 0.33 inches camera sensor, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality. LG Stylo 6 features a much longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG Stylo 6, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.