Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ's global score of 82.5. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, we must note that it's also a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. The iPhone X has a bit better looking screen than LG V30S ThinQ, although it has a little inferior pixels quantity per screen inch, a little bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little smaller screen.
IPhone X counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone X shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels camera, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ features greater battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 22% greater battery size.
IPhone X costs more money than the LG V30S ThinQ, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.