Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's general score of 81.3. The Apple iPhone X design is a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. IPhone X has a little sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller display, a little lower resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit lower screen density.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone X counts with a little better processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has 2 lesser and slower cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
LG V35 ThinQ features greater battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2716mAh. The iPhone X shoots clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures in low-light environments, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way less MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.