Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting a general score of 88.1 against 81.2. The Apple iPhone X construction has the same thickness than LG V40 ThinQ, but it's a bit heavier. Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a way lower 1125 x 2436px resolution, a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the display and a bit smaller display.
Apple iPhone X counts with a bit better processor than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The LG V40 ThinQ features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a 12 mega-pixels camera in the back and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone X, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.