Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a little bit better than LG V60 ThinQ, with a overall score of 88.1 against 87.6. IPhone X's design is thinner and extremely lighter than LG V60 ThinQ, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone X has a bit better processor than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has lesser RAM and less and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone X counts with a slightly better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a just a little better screen pixels density. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a lot more MP camera in the back, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a way bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much greater storage to install games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent greater battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V60 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG V60 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.