Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the LG Velvet's general score of 87.1. IPhone X is an noticeably older phone than the LG Velvet, but Apple managed to build it a bit lighter and a little thinner. The iPhone X features a bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite higher pixels density.
The LG Velvet has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. IPhone X has just a little better processing power than LG Velvet, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 lesser and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
LG Velvet has a way better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 2716mAh. LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Velvet. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG Velvet, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.