Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-09-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Glacier |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than the Microsoft Surface Duo, getting an 88.1 score against 78.8. IPhone X is a older and a lot thicker phone than the Microsoft Surface Duo, but Apple was able to make it much lighter anyway. The iPhone X has a little bit better screen than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a lot worse 1125 x 2436px resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count in each screen inch.
The iPhone X counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone X has a bit better processor than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has lesser and slower cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone X captures much better photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Apple iPhone X also has a larger aperture for better photos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a better resolution.
Microsoft Surface Duo counts with superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 3577mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Microsoft Surface Duo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Microsoft Surface Duo. If you want to save some money, you can buy Microsoft Surface Duo, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.