Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-09-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Microsoft Surface Duo 2's 85.3 overall score. Although the Apple iPhone X is notably older and notably thicker than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, it's body is still incredibly lighter. Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a much smaller display, a lot lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and way less brightness, it also counts with a little better pixels density.
IPhone X counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone X features a little better performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and 5 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4449mAh battery size against 2716mAh. The iPhone X has a little bit better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have the same video resolution, a 12 mega pixels camera and the same 60 fps video frame rates.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Microsoft Surface Duo 2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save some money and buy the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.