Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2024-06-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than Motorola Edge (2024), with an 88.1 score against 78.5. IPhone X's construction has the same weight than the Motorola Edge (2024), but it is just a little bit thinner. The Apple iPhone X has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has just a bit better looking screen than iPhone X, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per screen inch and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a way brighter screen. Motorola Edge (2024)'s memory capacity for applications and games is very similar to the iPhone X one, they have the same internal memory.
Motorola Edge (2024) features a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent more battery capacity. The Motorola Edge (2024) takes a bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge (2024) also has a camera with much more mega pixels and a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Edge (2024), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Edge (2024). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Edge (2024), giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.