Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, getting an 88.1 score against 80.9. Despite of the fact that the iPhone X is way older than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's construction is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a display that is just as good as iPhone X's display, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit lower pixels quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a really brighter display and a larger display.
The iPhone X counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with more processing cores and a 64 bits processing unit. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a much larger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
Apple iPhone X features a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.