Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2023-05-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is better than the Motorola Edge 40, having a general score of 88.1 against 77.2. The Apple iPhone X design has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 40, but it is just a little bit heavier. The Apple iPhone X and the Motorola Edge 40 have incredibly similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge 40 has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and way more brightness.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, because it has more internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone X has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has less cores (but faster) and 5 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Motorola Edge 40 has a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a lot larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments, a much bigger back camera sensor and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 40 has a much longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.