Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting a general score of 88.1 against 77. Apple iPhone X's construction is just a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it is a bit heavier and was released 6 years before. The iPhone X has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a lower number of cores and 5 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little sharper display than iPhone X, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with much more brightness and a little bit bigger display. IPhone X has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.