Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Interstellar Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 83.4. The Apple iPhone X design is thinner and lighter than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Apple iPhone X features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less processing cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone X has a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has much lower brightness and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a back camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a way better video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as iPhone X, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a way better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 69 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.