Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 global score. IPhone X's construction is a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it's just a little heavier and was released many years before. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a sharper display than iPhone X, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, a quite better 1256 x 2760 resolution, a much brighter screen and a quite bigger display.
The iPhone X and the Motorola Edge 50 Neo both have very similar memory for games and applications, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone X counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 59% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.