Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's score of 86.3. The iPhone X body is a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 7 years before. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit better looking display than iPhone X, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and much more screen brightness.
IPhone X has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution, a much bigger camera aperture and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.