Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting an 88.1 score against 87.1. Apple iPhone X's body is thinner and lighter than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. IPhone X counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has 9 GB less RAM and lesser cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit better display than iPhone X, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with much more brightness and a bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater memory to install games and applications than iPhone X, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 66% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.