Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LTPS |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is slightly better than Motorola Moto G 5G, with an 88.1 score against 81.5. The iPhone X construction is somewhat lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it was released 3 years before. IPhone X features a quite superior hardware performance than Moto G 5G, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone X has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a bit greater count of pixels per screen inch. The Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit more storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Moto G 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh. Moto G 5G shoots slightly better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.