Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Smoke black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than the Moto G Power, with an 88.1 score against 76.1. Despite of the fact that iPhone X is noticeably older than Moto G Power, it's construction is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner. The Apple iPhone X has a better CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has less cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone X features a sharper display than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit better display pixels density. Apple iPhone X takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Power, although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images in low-light environments and a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Apple iPhone X has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Moto G Power features a much better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.