Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is a little bit better than the Moto G200 5G, with a global score of 88.1 against 86.2. The iPhone X is an notably older phone than Moto G200 5G, but Apple managed to make it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. IPhone X counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone X features a bit more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a superior camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, because it has more internal memory. Moto G200 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.