Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the Moto G60s's general score of 79.9. The iPhone X design is somewhat lighter and much thinner than Moto G60s. The Apple iPhone X counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Moto G60s, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X has a better looking screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436px resolution. Moto G60s counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Moto G60s features a better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G60s also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Motorola Moto G60s counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.