Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than the Moto G8 Power, having an 88.1 score against 76. IPhone X's construction is incredibly thinner and lighter than Moto G8 Power, although it was released many years before. The iPhone X counts with a greater performance than Moto G8 Power, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X has a much better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite higher pixel density. IPhone X features more storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Apple iPhone X counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power, although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality photographs and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G8 Power. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G8 Power, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.