Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-08-28 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the Moto G9 Play's overall score of 76.7. Despite of the fact that the iPhone X is extremely older than the Moto G9 Play, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. IPhone X counts with a much more vibrant screen than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per screen inch and a way higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto G9 Play, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Apple iPhone X counts with a faster processing unit than Moto G9 Play, because although it has less RAM and 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Moto G9 Play takes much clearer videos and photos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G9 Play also has a larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments, a much more mega pixels back camera and a way larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
The Moto G9 Play features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.