Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-11-03 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than Motorola Moto Z Force, with a general score of 88.1 against 75.8. Although the iPhone X is newer than Motorola Moto Z Force, it's a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. The iPhone X counts with a superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a greater number of cores (and faster).
IPhone X has a bit better looking display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a just a bit worse display density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Apple iPhone X features a slightly better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot less MP resolution back camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a better memory for apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force counts with longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. If you want to save some money, you can buy Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.