Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2017-11-03 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a overall score of 88.1 against 77.4. Despite being the best we compare here, Apple iPhone X's design is heavier and extremely thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. IPhone X features a bit better CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone X features a little bit better screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density and a little worse 1125 x 2436 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display. IPhone X features just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video quality and a same resolution back facing camera, the iPhone X also counts with faster video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features more memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's battery performance is very similar to the iPhone X one, although the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has 2730mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
IPhone X is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.