Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2017-11-03 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. The iPhone X is better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it must be told that it's also a heavier and noticeably thicker device. The Apple iPhone X has a better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little larger display, a just a bit better display density and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The iPhone X features a superior performance than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone X shoots a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the iPhone X also counts with higher video frame rate.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a bit longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.