Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than Motorola Moto Z3, having a global score of 88.1 against 77.6. Although it's the best we are comparing here, the Apple iPhone X body is older, heavier and just a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3. Apple iPhone X has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite better screen pixel density.
The Moto Z3 counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone X counts with just a bit better performance than Moto Z3, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone X has a slightly better camera than Moto Z3, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same video quality and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and higher video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a bit superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z3. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto Z3, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.