Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 10.17 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, having an 88.1 score against 76.3. Despite being the best device in this review, we must highlight that it is also just a little thicker and heavier. IPhone X has a much better screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit greater pixel density.
The iPhone X has a superior processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has lesser cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone X counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality photos and a tinier aperture, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the iPhone X also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Moto Z3 Play has a bigger memory to install applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z3 Play has a bit longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
The iPhone X is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.