Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. Even though the iPhone X is way older than Motorola One Hyper, it's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Apple iPhone X counts with a better performing processor than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone X counts with a much better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit better pixels number per screen inch. The Motorola One Hyper features a better memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 47% more battery size. The Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.