Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | -- |
| OLED | LTPO |
| 463 pixels per inch | -- |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 10.17 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having an 88.1 score against 79.2. The iPhone X has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has less cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. IPhone X has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has way darker screen and a little bit smaller screen.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.