Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2020-09-23 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Polar night |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Nokia 8.3 5G's score of 80.5. Apple iPhone X is an extremely older phone than the Nokia 8.3 5G, but Apple could make it thinner and extremely lighter. The iPhone X has a more vivid screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a quite greater quantity of pixels in each display inch.
Apple iPhone X features just a bit better processing power than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Nokia 8.3 5G counts with slightly more storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 66 percent more battery capacity. The Nokia 8.3 5G's camera is just as good as Apple iPhone X's camera, because although the Nokia 8.3 5G has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photos.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Nokia 8.3 5G. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save some dollars and get the Nokia 8.3 5G, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.