Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Nokia |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 global score. The iPhone X body is just a little thinner than Nokia 9 PureView, although it's just a little bit heavier and was released around a year before. The Apple iPhone X features just a bit better screen than Nokia 9 PureView, although it has a bit smaller display, a just a bit inferior pixel quantity in each screen inch and a little bit lower 1125 x 2436px resolution.
IPhone X counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has more internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone X features a little faster processing unit than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone X shoots slightly better videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have a 12 megapixels back-facing camera, the same video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Apple iPhone X also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Nokia 9 PureView has improved battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 3320mAh battery size.
The iPhone X is a lot more expensive than the Nokia 9 PureView, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.