Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | -- |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Nokia XR20's score of 80.8. Although the iPhone X is much older than the Nokia XR20, it's design is extremely lighter and thinner. IPhone X features a little more vivid display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more screen brightness, a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit greater pixel quantity per display inch.
The Apple iPhone X has a quite superior performance than Nokia XR20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Nokia XR20 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Nokia XR20 also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs.
Nokia XR20 has just a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 counts with a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Nokia XR20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Nokia XR20, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.