Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-03 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Cyber shade |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. The Apple iPhone X is an older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but Apple could make it extremely thinner and somewhat lighter. Apple iPhone X features a little sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit higher count of pixels per screen inch.
Nubia Red Magic 3S's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Apple iPhone X one, both have equal internal memory. IPhone X counts with just a bit better processing power than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 less and slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Nubia Red Magic 3S captures much clearer photos and videos than iPhone X, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a really longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has an 84% more battery capacity.
Apple iPhone X is a lot more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.